На главнуюОбразованиеПохожее видеоЕще от: LizziesAnswers

"CALL NO MAN FATHER" DISPROVES CATHOLICISM

Оценок: 1420 | Просмотров: 24822
In Matthew 23:9 Jesus says "Call NO ONE on earth father, for you have ONE Father in Heaven, God." Is Jesus just being Hyperbolic or can we LITERALLY NOT call anyone Father?! A video I made on how to interpret the Bible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j60Y2OqEjMU&t=350s MORE CATHOLIC VIDEOS: My 10 FAVORITE Parts of Mass: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ygd8GMdv08 Why I’m Becoming Catholic pt. 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PscwvMDR-t0&t=22s Why I’m Becoming Catholic pt. 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRndjtob4lU What I Gave Up to Become Catholic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2V-4QjVfhk How My Views Changed on MARY: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY9VTCgpxHQ Why FAITH ALONE Salvation is WRONG https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31AiWRDLYq8&t=25s Why I LOVE Icons & Fellowship of the Saints! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTqnTa4RQDk&t=508s 5 Reasons Mary was a Perpetual Virgin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d74rcUf0ew&t=1203s Protestant Visits Latin Mass: What I Loved and HATED https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wzIO_26cjA&t=436s The First Catholic video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IynBRiPj4w&t=103s Why SOLA SCRIPTURA is Wrong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkZpLyUkRho&t=25s Business Inquires or Speaking Engagements: jeanette.hyatt@lizziesanswers.com ❤️ MY WEBSITE where I post all my writing: http://www.lizziesanswers.com 🎨 INSTAGRAM: lizziereezay http://www.instagram.com/lizziereezay 👻 SNAPCHAT: LizziesAnswers 🐦 Twitter: @lizziereezay http://www.twitter.com/lizziereezay FACEBOOK PAGE: http://www.facebook.com/lizziereezay ⚓️🚙
Категория: Образование
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Текстовые комментарии (814)
Peter B. (8 часов назад)
Lizzie, read all of Matthew 23:1-33. Jesus is confronting the hypocrisy of the Jewish leaders of the time. All traditions must be in line with scripture. See Matthew 15:all and Mark 7:all. (Corban violates th 5th commandment to honor your parents.) Teachers hold a much greater accountability for what they teach. James 3:1
Jared Easter (1 день назад)
Do you read from a KJV bible?
Francis Oliva (1 день назад)
Thank you I fully understand and makes things so clearly how one verse misinterpret the whole scripture thank you
Donald Cooley (11 дней назад)
Christ is talking about a spiritual father . Catholic refer  the pope as Holy father he is not your spiritual father  . If you are a true born again Christian then you have only one spiritual father that is God because we become the sons of God Joint heirs with Christ to the throne and God is our only spititual  Father
Albert Henriette (13 дней назад)
Dear its time you stop leading people to the lake of fire by playing that you know the truth . Do you know why pope clement the 14th was poisoned in 1773 ....and why Albino Luciani was poisoned later? Do you know the vows of the Jesuit order. if u don't plz keep silent and search why?
Daniel Teunissen (20 дней назад)
Paul went to rome not peter. Peter Went to Babylon
Gonzalo Luna (22 дня назад)
I call children in Sunday school or in my baseball team SON, when I want to be like a father figure. They never come back to me and call me father. It is obvious that Christ was referring to using that term on religious leaders.
Tapajara (23 дня назад)
Even Jesus insisted that his followers call him "brother". So the Roman Catholics insist that their spiritual leaders have titles that are above Jesus. That speaks for itself.
Tapajara (23 дня назад)
What is the difference between calling a priest "father" out of respect and calling him "father" to recognize his spiritual authority? Answer: No difference. They are the same thing and that is exactly what Jesus was talking about. The practice of perpetuating the belief that you can't be forgiven of your sins unless you confess to a priest is recognition that Roman Catholic priests are people with more spiritual authority than a mere believer. That is exactly the kind of thing that Jesus was talking about.
Tapajara (23 дня назад)
The use of titles implying spiritual authority is the very thing Jesus was referring to. He was not talking about using the word in the sense of biological parenthood nor were the Jewish priests that Jesus was referring to. So what the Roman Catholics are doing is the very thing that the Jews were doing and Jesus was talking about. You can dance around this subject all you want and conclude in concordance with your prejudices but the problem doesn't go away. What the lady in this video did was to dismiss that Jesus had anything to say in this verse.
Tapajara (23 дня назад)
This does not "disprove Catholicism". It merely points out that Jesus instructed people not to mimic one of the practices that the Jewish priests subscribed to and that is to recognize priests as spiritual authorities in the use of titles. That's why Baptists call their preachers "brother" instead of "father". This is more in line with Jesus's teachings. It means that Roman Catholics should be avoiding this practice (while they are not) but this is not to mean that everything that Roman Catholics do is wrong. But it is the basis for a lot of legitimate gripes that protestants have against Roman Catholics. Just read the long list of complaints that Martin Luther tacked to the church door. Most of these issues have their basis in this topic.
themikeschult (1 месяц назад)
Just simply.....Bravo!
Treva Peres (1 месяц назад)
Well explained Lizzie. Well done!
Jordan B (1 месяц назад)
You all should wake up Jesus is the way and the only way. True religion is in Christ alone God bless you all.
Travis (1 месяц назад)
https://discord.gg/h4nht6K
jidiaghe Joel (1 месяц назад)
Catholics are violators of God's words. Catholics are not yet saved because they worship a false god (satan).
Eugene Jackson Jr (1 месяц назад)
In terms of the gospel and all of the father names listed it is connecting Joseph with King David. He is a Davidian. Making the promise fulfilled since Jesus is his "son" Hopefully you will make a video on it, Lizzie
Eugene Jackson Jr (1 месяц назад)
Taking this in or out of context would not disprove Catholicism. I don't even understand why anybody would make that leap. If anything it would be a slam on Protestant Christians as they're the ones who do not feel context is importantand argued the Bible should be taken literally. The Catholic church has always felt the Bible needs contextual Scholars to help interpret it. Which is essentially the magisterium. Furthermore, there is no translation for many of the things that were said which is why they Catholic Church argued against what has happened. Even the seven days are disputed in terms of context as 7 was something conversational that we do not understand and never had a clear translation for (that's the short version, lol). Just like with Mary, the word used was implied virgin. It was something like a young woman and when you use that word you are stereotyping that she would be a virgin. There was language for Virgin but that was not used because it would have been weird.
Joseph Chapman (1 месяц назад)
So when Christ says 'call no man Father' he is saying that we should hold people with scrutiny?
James Thomas (2 месяца назад)
When it straight says not to call them father you shouldn't. It literally says it.
Noel Ko (2 месяца назад)
My question to non Catholic Does the Catholic was wrong to call father to the priest. Only responded to the COMMANDMEND of God to speak the TRUTH EPHESIANS 4: 15 ZECHariah 8: 16????? By context we also understand this Only one holy according to the Bible in Revelation 15: 14 only one holy the Lord... You see only one holy the Lord Apostle Paul call Holy to his brethren Christian in Hebrew3: 1 Also the Bible saith there is only one SON OF GOD JOHN 1: 18 BUT THE CHRISTIAN CALLED SONS OF GOD 1 JOHN 3: 1 ONLY ONE TEACHER RABBI MATHEW 23: 8 JOHN THE BAPTIST CALLED RABBI JOHN 3: 26 LUKE 3: 12 STEPHEN CALL FATHER TO THE PRIEST ACTS 7: 1-2 STEPHEN ONLY RESPONDED TO THE COMMANDMEND OF GOD TO SPEAK THE TRUTH ACCORDING AS WE READ IN ZECHARIAH 8: 6 IN NEW TESTAMENT God ALSO COMMAND TO SPEAK THE TRUTH EPHESIAN 4: 15 In Mathew 23: 9 against the truth God is enemies of lie false bogus God hit bogus false lie But he loved the truth he commanded to speak the truth... Stephen and Catholic responded to the COMMANDMEND... The disciple of John the Baptist responded to the COMMANDMEND AMEN
Noel Ko (2 месяца назад)
My question: I'm address to the anti Catholics Does the son has no Right to call father to his father.?? Jesus talk about has no Right to call father because there is only one father which in are in heaven... That is meaning... And the word Thou shall not call father.... Prevents against the REALITY... THE REALITY ONE FATHER NOT 10 NOT 100 NOT 1000.THEtruth is only one father.. Because of this we have no right to call father for there is only one father In Mathew 23: 9 There is no father except God... If there is no Father also no have son... So this verse hath no Father and son... If the father is absent wherefore the son also absent.. This text has no father and son NO HUMAN FATHER UPON THE EARTH... SO THERE IS NO SON ALSO IT'S ABSENT BUT THE OTHER VERSE ALREADY HATH A SON... PAUL CALL SON TO TIMOTHY'S... THEREFORE THIS TEXT BOTH FATHER AND SON IS PRESENT... NOT THE SAME TO MATHEW 23: 9 HAS NO FATHER AND SON.... THIS FACT ARE NOT UNDERSTAND BY ANTI CATHOLIC THEY ARE STUPID MATHEW 23: 9 REFER TO AGAINST THE TRUTH COMMANDMEND BUT REMEMBERED GOD COMMANDS TO US TO SPEAK THE TRUTH CATHOLIC MEMBER ONLY SPEAK THE TRUTH WHEN THE TIME THEY CALL FATHER TO THE PRIESTS
Noel Ko (2 месяца назад)
additional brief emphasise we should understand that this commandments against the truth against the realty what is a Reality? what is the truth?... the truth is we have only one father.... so wherefore this commandments forbade to contrary to the truth or reality like Mathew 23: 8 forbidden to Call Rabbi John the Baptist call Rabbi Luke 3: 13 John 3: 26 He CALLED TEACHER OR RABBI CHRIST COMMANDMEND PREVENTS TO CONTRARY TO THE TRUTH REMEMBERED GOD COMMANDMEND WE SHOULD SPEAK THE TRUTH WE ONLY SPEAK THE TRUTH WHEN WE THE TIME WE CALL FATHER TO THE PRIEST...
Noel Ko (2 месяца назад)
The meaning of Jesus saith we have no RIGHT TO CALL FATHER BECAUSE WE HAVE ONLY ONE FATHER WHICH IN HEAVEN... SPECIFIC FATHER WE HAVE NO RIGHT!!! TO CALL FATHER AS MALACHI MENTIONED MALACHI 2: 10... JESUS AND MALACHI THE SAME FATHER THEY MENTIONED THEY SPECIFIC FATHER WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO CALL FATHER... BECAUSE IT'S ABSENT IN ALL MAN IN UPON THE EARTH... THAT IS THE SIMPLE MEANING BUT THE ABNORMAL PROTESTANT CANNOT UNDERSTAND THEY'RE STUPID PERSON
ultimouomo11 (2 месяца назад)
That verse you quoted: Matthew 5:30 (at time index 4:01) is actually speaking about masturbation; according to the Mishna.
Thomas McCauley (2 месяца назад)
I met John Paul "The Great" in Rome. He was a very humble man but had faith that could move mountains. He was responsible for a Catholic revolution that toppled the Iron curtain. I never thought in my life-like I would be saying that Russia is more Christian then the USA. It was "Our Lady of Fatima's intention. The bullet from the failed assassination attempt by the KGB is in the church at Fatima, Portugal.
Rachel Paul (3 месяца назад)
Greattt!!! Catholics does not worship a man fathers but only the Lord our Father in heaven. People should read their bble WISELY NOT EASILY!!!!
MrLamontSanford (3 месяца назад)
Someone I knew once read some research in a PROTESTANT journal that Protestants never had an issue with this until the fundamentalists arrived on the scene around 1900, that even they called their leaders "father"
MrLamontSanford (3 месяца назад)
Great stuff here...REALLY smart!!
dirtirobi (3 месяца назад)
Catholicism is a false religion that worships the traditions of men and ignores Gods laws!!
Whipsaw (4 месяца назад)
No, no, no. The context was calling someone Father from a spiritual stand point which is exactly what the Catholic cult does! Twisting scripture yet again to fit your unBiblical teachings.
Carmelo Junior (4 месяца назад)
They can argue that Peter, Paul and John talk about their "children" in the faith but we don't actually have letters from , for example, Timothy to Paul or a young disciple to Peter. It is obvious that these first Christians used to refer to the apostles and elders as Fathers and particularly referred to the Virgin Mary as MOTHER.
Libbie Paris (4 месяца назад)
You really have no idea what you are talking about. The Bible is clear.
Jeff Kopp (4 месяца назад)
Lizzie, the Roman Catholic Church has RE-WRITTEN THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. What have you gotten your self into.
Pat Aherne (4 месяца назад)
The Father thing... It has been identified by biblical scholars as hyperbola ..which meant in this context not to raise others up to a height over you. All are equal in the eyes of God. The other view..strict interpretation from Mathew:..."Dont call any man you father for you have one father and He is in Heaven". !) What about your own natural father? DUH! 2) A Catholic never calls a priest "my father"..they call him "father" 3) Old and new Testament of the Bible...full of Jesus and ancient prophets calling people "Father". Handed us a filial relationship within the Church. 4) Pope means "father". Protestants continuously refer in their complaints to "The Pope". Lol.
2gointruth With Good News of The True Gospel (5 месяцев назад)
All those who preach Catholicism and Christianity are denying the true Teaching of Jesus and are misleading their many followers: Where he already knew this would happen, because he is the (ultimate) prophet who was chosen to speak for God – Here then (and proof-positive) are just some of his many words from the Gospels of the New Testament… “Do not call any man on earth ‘father’; for you have one Father and he is in heaven. Nor must you be called ‘teacher’; you have one Teacher, the Messiah.” – (Matthew 23: 9-10) – “Take care that no one misleads you: For many will come claiming my name…” – (Matthew 24: 4) – “Many false prophets will arise, and will mislead many; and as lawlessness spreads, men’s love for one another will grow cold. But the man who holds out to the end will be saved” – (Matthew 24: 11-13) – “I am the way; I am the truth and I am life; no one comes to the Father except by me. If you knew me you would know my Father too.” – (John 14: 6-7) – “When you pray, go into a room by yourself, and shut the door. Pray to your Father who is there in the secret place; and your Father who sees what is secret will reward you. In your prayers do not go babbling on like the heathen, who imagine that the more they say the more likely they are to be heard. Do not imitate them. Your Father knows what your needs are before you ask him. This is how you should pray: Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name, Your kingdom come; your will be done, on earth as in heaven, Give us today our daily bread, And forgive us the wrong we have done, as we have forgiven those who have wronged us. And do not bring us to the test, but save us from the evil one. For yours is the kingdom, the power and the glory, for ever. Amen. For if you forgive others the wrongs they have done, your heavenly Father will also forgive you; but if you do not forgive others, then the wrongs you have done will not be forgiven by your Father.” – (Matthew 6: 6-15) – “Truly I tell you; if anyone obeys my teaching he shall never know what it is to die.” – (John 8: 51) – “Pass no judgement, and you will not be judged. For as you judge others, so you will yourselves be judged, and whatever measure you deal out to others will be dealt back to you.” – (Matthew 7: 1-2) – “Always treat others as you would like them to treat you: that is the Law and the Prophets. Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life and only a few find it. Beware of false prophets, men who come to you dressed up as sheep while underneath they are savage wolves. You will recognize them by the fruits they bear.” – (Matthew 7: 12-16) – “I am the gate; anyone who comes into the fold through me shall be safe.” – (John 10: 9) – “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” – (Matthew 7: 21) – “I am the resurrection and I am life. If a man has faith in me, even though he dies, he shall come to life; and no one who is alive and has faith shall ever die.” – (John 11: 25-26) – “I have not come to judge the world, but to save the world” – (John 12: 47) – “Whoever then will acknowledge me before men, I will acknowledge him before my Father in heaven; and whoever disowns me before men, I will disown him before my Father in heaven.” – (Matthew 10: 32-34) – “The disciples came to Jesus and asked, ‘Who, then, is the greatest in the kingdom of Heaven?’ He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. And he said: ‘Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of Heaven. Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this child is the greatest in the kingdom of Heaven. And whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me. If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, It would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Woe to the world because of the things that cause people to stumble! Such things must come, but woe to the person through whom they come!’” – (Matthew 18: 1-7) – “An expert in the law, [a leading religious Pharisee] tested him with this question: ‘Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?’ He answered, ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind. That is the greatest commandment. It comes first. The second is like it: Love your neighbour as yourself. Everything in the Law and the Prophets hangs on these two commandments.’” – (Matthew 22: 35-40) – “There is no greater love than this, that a man should lay down his life for his friends.” – (John 15: 13) – "Stay awake, and pray that you may be spared the test. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak." – (Matthew 26: 41) – “teach them to observe all that I have commanded you. And be assured, I am with you always, to the end of time.” – (Matthew 28: 20) – “One of the criminals who hung there also mocked and taunted him: ‘Aren’t you the Messiah? Save yourself, and us!’ But the other criminal rebuked him. ‘Have you no fear of God? You are under the same sentence as he. For us it is plain justice; we are paying the price for our misdeeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.’ And he said, ‘Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.’ He answered, “I tell you this: today you shall be with me in Paradise.’” – (Luke 23: 39-43) – “For it is my Father’s will that everyone who looks upon the Son and puts his faith in him shall possess eternal life; and I will raise him up on the last day” – (John 6: 40) – Yours always, in true Spirit and in prayer, 2gointruth, Wednesday the 18th of July, 2018: – (Matthew 5:14-16) – A new day and a new beginning for any one of us: Here are some more references for any further study… – (Genesis 3: 24) – (Genesis 6: 5-6) – (Genesis 6: 11) – (Genesis 8: 21) – (Exodus 12: 17) – – (Exodus 25: 18-22) – (Leviticus 19: 18) – (Leviticus 26: 11-12) – (Deuteronomy 8: 3-4) – – (Deuteronomy 18: 18) – (Deuteronomy 29: 29) – (Joshua 22: 5) – (2 Samuel 6: 2) – – (2 Samuel 7: 12-14) – (Psalm 2: 2) – (Psalm 10: 3-7) – (Psalm 14: 1) – (Psalm 15) – – (Psalm 22) – (Psalm 66: 1) – (Proverbs 8: 17) – (Proverbs 15: 29) – (Isaiah 7: 14) – – (Isaiah 9: 6-7) – (Isaiah 52: 13) – (Isaiah 53) – (Isaiah 61: 1) – (Jeremiah 31: 31-34) – – (Jeremiah 47: 6-7) – (Ezekiel 28: 14-16 ) – (Daniel 7: 13-14) – (Micah 5: 4) – – (Micah 7: 6) – (Zephaniah 1: 7) – (Zechariah 9: 9) – (Zechariah 12: 10) – – (Also worth noting, are Aristotle, Confucius, Plato and Socrates, even Gandhi a humble man qualified in British Law and well-read in most all scriptures; he has also said; “You must be the change that you wish to see in the world.”) – – (Matthew 4: 19) – (Matthew 5: 10-12) – (Matthew 5:17) – (Matthew 5:19-20) – – (Matthew 5: 43-48) – (Matthew 6: 2-4) – (Matthew 7: 5) – (Matthew 7: 7-11) – – (Matthew 7: 24-27) – (Matthew 11: 28-30) – (Matthew 12: 30-37) – (Matthew 15: 12-14) – – (Matthew 23: 9) – (Mark 1: 9-11) – (Mark 9: 50) – (Mark 15: 4-5) – (((Luke 1: 1-4))) – – (Luke 4: 1-13) – (Luke 6: 22-36) – (Luke 6: 39) – (Luke 6: 46-49) – (Luke 9: 23-26) – – (Luke 12: 40) – (Luke 12: 48) – (John 3: 1-7) – (John 6: 51) – (John 6: 53-58) – – (John 7: 16-18) – (John 8: 12) – (John 8: 32) – (John 8: 34-35) – (John 8: 58) – – (John 10: 14-17) – (John 11: 25-26) – (John 12: 25-26) – (John 12: 44-50) – – (John 13: 20) – (John 13: 34) – (John 17: 24-26) – (((John 21: 24-25))) –
Dean Philip Saunders (5 месяцев назад)
Great video Lizzie. As a fellow Catholic, you may be interested in the Ignatius Catholic Study Bible by Catholic scholars Dr Scott Hahn and Curtis Mitch. It is an elegant and insightful Catholic teaching on the New Testament. You may also be interested in St. Padre Pio "https://www.youtube.com/embed/UbgXRODiT04?rel=0". God bless.
Markesa Hill (5 месяцев назад)
Dear lizzy, Perhaps you havent looked in depth into this yet. . . but you referenced all the verses in matt 1 saying "father" as a rebuttle for matt 23. . . .however, if you bring it back to the greek the word father in both if these instinces IS NOT the same word. Therefore, this argument of yours stating that, "Matthew wouldn't have written 'father' so many times if it was wrong" is irrelevent. Not this that will change your mind in any way concerning your stance on this topic as a whole, but as a teacher of others its best to have accurate sources and reasonings behind your argument. Therefore, would behoove you to produce a statement retraction concerning this false information.
J (5 месяцев назад)
I always notice the same trends among non catholic Christians with the Bible. They either forget the whole context of something, take something literally too much, or ignore the roots of something in the Old Testament. Not to mention sometimes what they think scripture says in one part of the Bible is disproven later in the Bible. They just like to be very selective and focus on one thing and are too literal
J (5 месяцев назад)
And the real irony is that with the Eucharist, they ignore the literalness of that lol
Kenneth Blair (5 месяцев назад)
I believe Jesus is referring to "Father" or "Lord" as a Title given to men. English Prince's are given a title "Lord", which appears in my opinion against scripture. Most denominations have doctrinal error, that doesn't mean that all of them are not Christian, and the people that go there. One has to study the scriptures and pray for themselves.
Fritz rey Calma (6 месяцев назад)
This video d not believe in Jesus who said that in the church call no one father
Jeremiah Tassinari (6 месяцев назад)
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." John 3:16 Only Jesus is the way to Heaven and be saved from hell. "But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." Romans 5:8 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6 Have you confessed Jesus as your LORD and Savior? You must confess Him as your LORD and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead to be saved from eternal damnation in hell and be able to go to Heaven "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." Romans 10:9 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." 1 John 5:7
The Atheist Jeffrey Dahmer78 (6 месяцев назад)
Call no man Father, especially a pedophilia ridden perverted priest
ElKabong61 (6 месяцев назад)
Nice fake-out title. I love it! :-)
Him Bike (6 месяцев назад)
Bishops are called father? I thought they were called “your grace” or “your excellency” Or “Right Reverend” love your videos
Jeremy Rojas (6 месяцев назад)
I mean no offense because I love all people of all religions but this is the problem with many Catholics is that they try to make excuses and make a path around what the Bible says. What the Bible says is set in stone, it can’t be change, what it says is what should be done end of story
paul burke (6 месяцев назад)
Liz you don't understand. Every one is not equal to me. Liz I am going to pray for your allegiance to a church based on lies. The true meaning of Pope is he is Jesus Christ on earth. That is Heresey. Leave the false Catholic God you worship not The true God Jesus Christ you worship. Religion cannot save you only a relationship with Jesus Christ John 3:16 and pray to no saint. Captain Jesus END OF LINE
john browne (7 месяцев назад)
So do you also believe, now that you have joined the Roman Catholic cult, the heresy that the pope the "vicar of Christ," ie: Christ's representative on earth when the Bible clearly teaches that the Holy Spirit is God's representative on earth?
Maria Ramirez (7 месяцев назад)
I love watching your videos.... first one was Protestant convert to Catholic... I have learned so much thru your videos...
rejecting racists (7 месяцев назад)
Watch f.barron.his chanel helps too.thank you lizzie.i found ur chsnel yesterday.it is restoring the image of god that i lost.well im not ready for now but who knows
KJV (7 месяцев назад)
The teaching of the Protestant reformers contradict reason: There are many beliefs put forward in the writings of the Protestant reformers which are anti-Christian, illogical and contradict reason. One example we give here is the theology put forth by Calvin, Zwingle and Beza which in summary says that it is God's will that we sin, and because we cannot avoid the will of God, we can not act otherwise, therefore we are not at fault for any sin. Where in Scripture is this taught we ask? This blatantly contradicts reason and Scripture. Another belief put forth in the writings of Calvin mentions the Law of God is impossible. What else does this imply other than Our Lord is a tyrant who commands impossible things? If it is impossible, why is it commanded? Even more absurd is the belief of Luther, Zwingle, and Calvin that the whole Church may have erred for a thousand or so years in understanding the Word of God, yet these reformers can each guarantee they understand it right! "If the salt lose its savor, wherewith shall it be salted?" Matthew 5:13. In other words if the Church, the guardian of truth, were to lose the truth, by whom shall the truth be found? By Luther? By Calvin? We find it infinitely more likely that the Protestant reformers erred rather than the entire Church. Another absurdity we see with the Protestant reformers is their claim that the Catholic Church has erred, and that all men can err, and then follow this by preaching their own interpretation of certain verses of the Scriptures, claiming it as the Word of God. If everyone else has erred or is capable of erring, how can the Protestant reformers be so audacious to claim they have not erred? Another absurd belief of the Protestant reformers is that we must interpret the Scriptures by the analogy of faith. This can only lead to countless denominations with opposing views, and when any of these opposing denominations presents their view of a verse in Scripture, Protestants admire every interpretation given as though all are acceptable to God! This is illogical, for as we mention above, if one denomination believes in the real presence in the Holy Eucharist while another believes the Eucharist is just a symbol, only one can be correct. The real presence is either TRUE, or IDOLATRY, so believing one or the other will decide whether or not we are saved. Where in Scripture did Jesus say believing in two totally opposite views is acceptable? In addition, where else in the world is such a belief accepted that many views are acceptable? Surely mathematicians and scientists do not allow multiple beliefs for the same situation and neither do we see such an illogical belief anywhere else. Yet how illogical is it for the Protestant reformers to suddenly propose an "all beliefs are acceptable" belief starting in the 16th century? Considering we all believe in Jesus and what He taught us, is it not more logical for Jesus to have left seven Sacraments for the justification and sanctification of the sinner rather than leave just two, one of which serves for nothing and the other for little? Would it not be more logical for Jesus to have left the power of absolving in the Church then to have not left it at all? Would it not be more logical for Our Lord to have left a visible Church, which is universal, of striking aspect, and perpetual than to have left it little, secret, scattered and liable to corruption? Aside from the statements from the reformers which contradict reason, we also see contradictory statements as well. To this we simply state that someone sent by God to reform the Church could not and would not teach in a contradictory manner such as we have seen Martin Luther do, for how can we believe someone who teaches one thing, then teaches the opposite? Our Lord and His Apostles taught truth, never contradiction. These illogical beliefs and contradictory teachings which we mention above are clearly either contrary to the teachings of Christ, contradict reason or contradict themselves, and the Protestant reformers propose many of these beliefs in their reformation as medicine for the Church?
Kimora Bella (7 месяцев назад)
Great, thanks Lizzie to preach non Catholic so they could know and understand the Catholic tradition which is based on the Bible itself..
dave d (7 месяцев назад)
Jesus is not exaggerating here at all. He is letting us know that its not good practice to exalt people by their titles and it should be avoided. He isn't talking about earthly fathers or Paul being fatherlike to Timothy. He is talking about THE ABUSE OF THE FATHER TITLE> Think of the history for a moment. Hasn't he been proven right? You in the Catholic Church have given this power over to the Priests and the Title, and look at the abuse? Children, who saw these "Fathers" as having an Exalted position, just look at HOW MANY LIVES were destroyed?? Think of Jan Hus who was burnt at the stake due to the abuse of Power. Lukes gospel is clear "Beware of the teachers of the law. They like to walk around in flowing robes and love to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces and have the most important seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at banquets." "They devour widows' houses and for a show make lengthy prayers. These men will be punished most severely."
dave d (7 месяцев назад)
Exposing Idiots/Team Bible, Your not fooling anyone.
Exposing Idiots (7 месяцев назад)
you make me laugh moron
dave d (7 месяцев назад)
Exposing Idiots, to bad you feel that way. In your view, when was the last legitimate pope?
Exposing Idiots (7 месяцев назад)
Of course they condemned him for being a heretic after all he was one just like you
dave d (7 месяцев назад)
Exposing Idiots, what is interesting is that Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II, fit that title, as they seem sincere and show fruit of this, and yet I am told by many tradionalists that these popes are heretics!
Pedro pepe (7 месяцев назад)
Call no one father, cause you only have one father and is in heaven
Pedro pepe (7 месяцев назад)
Team Bible i dont understand sorry
Team Bible (7 месяцев назад)
no one does you jerk God And Jesus called folks father you where do you place them
Pedro pepe (7 месяцев назад)
Team Bible i personally dont put paul at the same level as jesus
Team Bible (7 месяцев назад)
Call no man teacher. Third, a careful examination of the context of Matthew 23 shows that Jesus didn’t intend for his words here to be understood literally. The whole passage reads, "But you are not to be called ‘rabbi,’ for you have one teacher, and you are all brethren. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called ‘masters,’ for you have one master, the Christ" (Matt. 23:8–10). The first problem is that although Jesus seems to prohibit the use of the term "teacher," in Matthew 28:19–20, Christ himself appointed certain men to be teachers in his Church: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations . . . teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you." Paul speaks of his commission as a teacher: "For this I was appointed a preacher and apostle . . . a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth" (1 Tim. 2:7); "For this gospel I was appointed a preacher and apostle and teacher" (2 Tim. 1:11). He also reminds us that the Church has an office of teacher: "God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers" (1 Cor. 12:28); and "his gifts were that some should be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and teachers" (Eph. 4:11). There is no doubt that Paul was not violating Christ’s teaching in Matthew 23 by referring so often to others as "teachers." Fundamentalists themselves slip up on this point by calling all sorts of people "doctor," for example, medical doctors, as well as professors and scientists who have Ph.D. degrees (i.e., doctorates). What they fail to realize is that "doctor" is simply the Latin word for "teacher." Even "Mister" and "Mistress" ("Mrs.") are forms of the word "master," also mentioned by Jesus. So if his words in Matthew 23 were meant to be taken literally, Fundamentalists would be just as guilty for using the word "teacher" and "doctor" and "mister" as Catholics for saying "father." But clearly, that would be a misunderstanding of Christ’s words. i.) If you look at Matthew 23: 1-24, it is obviously the overall thrust of the passage is about assuming positions of authority in the Church to aggrandize one's self or stroke one's ego (the scribes and Pharisees occupying "Moses's seat" and then expecting people to call them "Rabbi", "Father", etc but doing nothing to "lift a finger" to alleviate the burden they bind on people's consciences / the obligations they impose. It is a discourse on SERVANT leadership ("The Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give His life as a ransom for many") NOT a fastidious rant about religious forms of address or ecclesiastic titles. ii.) IF the typical Protestant interpretation of Matthew 23: 9 is correct, then it makes St. Paul a sinner and invalidates the divine inspiration of his epistles, "I am writing you this not to shame you, but to admonish you as my beloved children. Even if you should have countless guides to Christ, yet you do not have many fathers, for I BECAME YOUR FATHER IN CHRIST JESUS through the gospel. Therefore, I urge you, be imitators of me." cf. I Corinthians 4: 14-16 Obviously St. Paul is not referring to biological paternity, but a spiritual one "through the Gospel". By preaching the Gospel to the Corinthians in his ministry, he became a FATHER to them, by their becoming "beloved children" of God. Besides this passage, Ephesians 3: 14-15 is also good, "For this reason I kneel before the Father, from whom ALL FATHERHOOD in heaven and on earth is named,...". In other words, human 'fatherhood' (whether biological or spiritual) PARTICIPATES IN God's Fatherhood. At Matthew 23: 9, Jesus Christ is admonishing the scribes and Pharisees who had gotten such an inflated sense of ego that they believed, because they sat on "Moses's seat" deciding matters by interpreting Tanakh / the "Old Testament" and applying it to specific cases brought to them by the People of God, that they were CHANGING clear prescriptions laid down in Torah (e. g. setting aside the commandment to 'Honor father and mother" by a child claiming the support they were obligated to give to their parents they would give to "God" because they decided it was a higher purpose, etc) and substituting their man made rules, AS IF they themselves were the "Father" / YHWH. The passage is not about a literalist use of a title or form of address ("father") but about servant leadership. And when their fastidious Protestant interpretation so OBVIOUSLY contradicts I Corinthians 4: 14-16 where the Apostles St. Paul calls himself "father" by analogy to those to whom he preached the Gospel, you can be sure their interpretation is wrong because it sets two separate passages of divinely inspired sacred Scripture at odds with one another
BlazingLove3:16 (7 месяцев назад)
The Pope is referred to as "Holy Father" which is not biblical. Roman Catholics call their priests “father,” and the Pope is the “holy father.” Abbots take their title from the Aramaic word abba, which means “father.” This is clearly unbiblical. The priest as “father” is problematic. In the case of “holy father,” there is no doubt this title is unbiblical. No man can take on the title of “holy” anything, because only God is holy. This title gives the Pope a status that is never intended for any man on earth. Even the apostle Paul made no claim to holiness, referring to himself as the chief of sinners (1 Timothy 1:15). Although as Christians we have exchanged our sin for the righteousness of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:21), holiness will not be attained until we are in heaven and have left the last vestiges of our sin natures behind. Until then, the Pope has no more holiness than the average Christian and is not entitled to be called “holy father.” Got questions?
Steffen Romarheim (7 месяцев назад)
Oh, wait! We cant take the verses that disprove catholicism out of context? Well atleast all verses you say "prove" catholicism can be taken directly out of context. If you look at the Bible and only understand it in the way you like, then you dont believe in the Bible, nor God but you only believe yourself and your opinions. I dont want to sound harsh but I'd like to see more of the perspectives about how you understand scripture, and not be stuck to your own opinions.
str8tblade (7 месяцев назад)
YOU THE BEST!!!!!!!
alex krakowski (7 месяцев назад)
You’re great, I saw some anti-catholic on YouTube bring this argument up to disprove Catholicism, i know that this is not the case. I pray that man and others who truly take “call no man father” literally will reveal the truth and stop their false understandings.
AVATAR PARADIGMS (7 месяцев назад)
I'll address this. The Gospel of Matthew's statement is paralleled in the Apocryphal Sayings Gospel of Thomas, which essentially states the same thing. Thomas dates to roughly the year 50 A.D. With Matthew paralleling it, it's almost certain that Christ said this teaching. The question, then, is now a matter of how it's implemented. Let's skip the lengthy, esoteric interpretations in favor of focusing more on the traditionally Catholic interpretations of these teachings. Christ's teaching that we never address anyone who is not seated in The Father's authority is true - but it has to be qualified. Following Christ's crucifixion, death, and subsequent resurrection, he commissioned the Apostolic Tradition under St. Peter, the first Pope and the Vicar of Christ, to unite to form the Mystic Body of Christ in the period following his Ascension until his 2nd Coming. Christ himself came in the authority of The Father, forgave sins on behalf of The Father, and was worshipped in place of The Father. Following Christ's Ascension, he delegated The Church to be as he was: The Church, as the Mystic Body of Christ, was now invested with the authority of The Father as Christ was, to forgive sins on behalf of The Father as Christ was, and to intercede in the prayerful worship of The Father as Christ was. For the church is the Mystic Body of Christ resurrected, of which The Father is the Head, Christ is the Heart, the Holy Spirit is the Soul and the Church with its Deacons, Priests, Bishops, Cardinals, Saints and Pope are its Sacred Limbs and Members. Thus when one calls a Priest with the honorific Title of Father, it is because he was commissioned by Christ as the representative of The Father on earth to intercede on your behalf, to forgive your sins, and to bring you into Salvation through faith in Christ. So strangely enough, when properly interpreted, the verse does quite the opposite of falsify Catholicism. If anything, it falsifies Protestantism and the Evangelical Church, both of which schismed from the Apostolic Tradition which began with the Apostles, were consolidated in St. Peter as the first Pope, and first established its theology through the Patristic writings of the early church Fathers.
Salvador Marquez (7 месяцев назад)
this girl talks more about her religion then what the truth is God Jesus the Holy Spirit, your religion is in what's going to open the doors for heaven.
dsvet (7 месяцев назад)
I'm sorry but the Apostles calling people son and children was because they were relatively new Christians and 'babes' in Christ. This does not prove that Apostles were considered "fathers". the father term was used in Judaism. The catholic church just borrowed from the old law and terminology and brought it this side of the cross. We are now to refer to those in Christ as brother or sister not father.
Big Bearn (8 месяцев назад)
Yes, the Catholic Church is the correct Church. Here are obstacles that cause people to leave or not join the church and a few ressources to help one understand Doctrine. 1 Contraceptive teaching ( the church has it right: read the Cathechism ) 2.Corpenicus evolution/ Darwinism( view the documentary the Principle, research the Kobe centre) 3. All perverse sexual acts ( read Cathechism) 4. the sexual abuses in the church ( read how the Apostasy will be everywhere before the end time( look up : Father Gobbi, Fatima, Lady of La Salette, Vasula and Mark Mallett just to name a few)
WishmasterTheDark (8 месяцев назад)
This girl always seemed way too edgy. In this video she said she is back in California. Makes sense now.
Sword of Truth (8 месяцев назад)
You are a deceptive lying Jezebel.
SERIEDAD COMUNITARIA (8 месяцев назад)
Very good explained. Its so easy to understand if you open your mind to understand. Protestants just don't wanna get it. They justlike to contradicts the scripture.
S. G. (8 месяцев назад)
Tons of Love & Prayers for you 😇 Heretic you are !
Bible BitzTV (8 месяцев назад)
Actually the Greek indicates the idea to love less the English translators translated the word the Greek word as hate
Richard Einsberg (8 месяцев назад)
catholic is always catholic.... protestant is like copying what catholics did and do changes 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 like eucharist every end of the year.. baptism 😂😂😂😂😂 confirmation 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 and lots of other traditional old way of making a person to be real christian.... comment below all catholics🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
Rosemary is romero (8 месяцев назад)
I love you! My sister in faith!
Jay Bui (8 месяцев назад)
Every protestant I have asked for proof of sola fide in history before the Reformation they had nothing. Zero historical evidence. A completely MAN MADE new invention of the 16th century.
Jay Bui (8 месяцев назад)
Protestants will go on desperation mode to find the dumbest objections to catholic practices. James called Abraham our Father in faith.
Ruth Pavich (8 месяцев назад)
And didn't Jesus call Abraham, "FATHER Abraham"?
mikepl82 (8 месяцев назад)
From Church of Christ to Catholic.... You move from one cult to to another. What’s next JW?
Michael Stirm (8 месяцев назад)
You're beautiful and knowledgeable!
Csaba Márton (8 месяцев назад)
1. Jesus calls God "Holy Father" in John 17:11. The meaning of this name cannot be changed. "Holy Father" means God, like heavenly Father. John 17:11, And I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me, that they may be one, even as we are one. 2. Calling someone father means that you are born from him. You call God your heavenly Father or Holy Father if you were born from above, but if you call "father" someone else from earth you say that you are born from him, which shall not be true. Jesus deliberately left out "father" from the list, as he wouldn't call anybody father: Matthew 12:50, For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.
Team Bible (8 месяцев назад)
I wonder what Jesus says about you a lair oh yes he hates you and condemns you to hell you fool
Csaba Márton (8 месяцев назад)
Your words stand against you. Do you hear what Jesus said?: "But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire." I forgive you and I have nothing more to say.
Team Bible (8 месяцев назад)
apparently you ignore him moron
Csaba Márton (8 месяцев назад)
Apparently you don't want to hear what Jesus said.
Team Bible (8 месяцев назад)
apparently you the one who doesn't choose Jesus or his teachings Call no man teacher. Third, a careful examination of the context of Matthew 23 shows that Jesus didn’t intend for his words here to be understood literally. The whole passage reads, "But you are not to be called ‘rabbi,’ for you have one teacher, and you are all brethren. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called ‘masters,’ for you have one master, the Christ" (Matt. 23:8–10). The first problem is that although Jesus seems to prohibit the use of the term "teacher," in Matthew 28:19–20, Christ himself appointed certain men to be teachers in his Church: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations . . . teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you." Paul speaks of his commission as a teacher: "For this I was appointed a preacher and apostle . . . a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth" (1 Tim. 2:7); "For this gospel I was appointed a preacher and apostle and teacher" (2 Tim. 1:11). He also reminds us that the Church has an office of teacher: "God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers" (1 Cor. 12:28); and "his gifts were that some should be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and teachers" (Eph. 4:11). There is no doubt that Paul was not violating Christ’s teaching in Matthew 23 by referring so often to others as "teachers." Fundamentalists themselves slip up on this point by calling all sorts of people "doctor," for example, medical doctors, as well as professors and scientists who have Ph.D. degrees (i.e., doctorates). What they fail to realize is that "doctor" is simply the Latin word for "teacher." Even "Mister" and "Mistress" ("Mrs.") are forms of the word "master," also mentioned by Jesus. So if his words in Matthew 23 were meant to be taken literally, Fundamentalists would be just as guilty for using the word "teacher" and "doctor" and "mister" as Catholics for saying "father." But clearly, that would be a misunderstanding of Christ’s words. i.) If you look at Matthew 23: 1-24, it is obviously the overall thrust of the passage is about assuming positions of authority in the Church to aggrandize one's self or stroke one's ego (the scribes and Pharisees occupying "Moses's seat" and then expecting people to call them "Rabbi", "Father", etc but doing nothing to "lift a finger" to alleviate the burden they bind on people's consciences / the obligations they impose. It is a discourse on SERVANT leadership ("The Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give His life as a ransom for many") NOT a fastidious rant about religious forms of address or ecclesiastic titles. ii.) IF the typical Protestant interpretation of Matthew 23: 9 is correct, then it makes St. Paul a sinner and invalidates the divine inspiration of his epistles, "I am writing you this not to shame you, but to admonish you as my beloved children. Even if you should have countless guides to Christ, yet you do not have many fathers, for I BECAME YOUR FATHER IN CHRIST JESUS through the gospel. Therefore, I urge you, be imitators of me." cf. I Corinthians 4: 14-16 Obviously St. Paul is not referring to biological paternity, but a spiritual one "through the Gospel". By preaching the Gospel to the Corinthians in his ministry, he became a FATHER to them, by their becoming "beloved children" of God. Besides this passage, Ephesians 3: 14-15 is also good, "For this reason I kneel before the Father, from whom ALL FATHERHOOD in heaven and on earth is named,...". In other words, human 'fatherhood' (whether biological or spiritual) PARTICIPATES IN God's Fatherhood. At Matthew 23: 9, Jesus Christ is admonishing the scribes and Pharisees who had gotten such an inflated sense of ego that they believed, because they sat on "Moses's seat" deciding matters by interpreting Tanakh / the "Old Testament" and applying it to specific cases brought to them by the People of God, that they were CHANGING clear prescriptions laid down in Torah (e. g. setting aside the commandment to 'Honor father and mother" by a child claiming the support they were obligated to give to their parents they would give to "God" because they decided it was a higher purpose, etc) and substituting their man made rules, AS IF they themselves were the "Father" / YHWH. The passage is not about a literalist use of a title or form of address ("father") but about servant leadership. And when their fastidious Protestant interpretation so OBVIOUSLY contradicts I Corinthians 4: 14-16 where the Apostles St. Paul calls himself "father" by analogy to those to whom he preached the Gospel, you can be sure their interpretation is wrong because it sets two separate passages of divinely inspired sacred Scripture at odds with one another
John Coontas (8 месяцев назад)
I love it when you use the word "chill."  Like, "we just have to be chill."  Too funny.  Great job.
Carlos Flores (8 месяцев назад)
I have no way of trully knowing who's saved and who's not. I do however believe that people are saved based on the decision they make regarding Jesus Christ. Your desire to seek the truth in order to be closer to God makes me believe that you are saved. It's not the church that determines our salvation it's who our faith and obedience is surrendered to. However, I do want to add that since your video is intended to prove that it's okay to call a priest a pope, just about every verse you use is one where some authority figure is referring to those under him as their son or child. This reminds me of school teachers who refer to their students as "their children" Should these kids refer to them as their mother or father in return? You say that the bible teaches in that verse that we should do as they say and not as they do because God has appointed authority among the church who some times do corrupt things but we should still be abiding to them as we see them being bad examples yet, part of why you were turned off from following up within the ministry you started at was because of the youth leader who mis treated her relationship with you and wasn't the best example of a youth leader in that particular time of your life. I'm sure you know plenty of protestants who get a lot of pleasure in proving people wrong in their faith of a different religion. Make sure don't become that person yourself. There is no pleasure in knowing that people can go to hell basses on ignorance.
Christina Shenouda (8 месяцев назад)
Hi Lizzie, I've been thoroughly enjoying the content of your videos! As an orthodox christian, it has really motivated me to go back to the history of the early church and explore how it is relevant to us today; there is just so much that the early church/church fathers and mothers teach us, particularly when looking a little deeper into this idea of communion/unity/kononia. I just wanted to ask; do you plan on covering a topic such as the role of women in the catholic church? I guess I'm curious as to how similar/different it is to the role of women in the orthodox church (e.g. in the coptic church, just like we call our priests "father" (who are married), we might call their wives "tasoni" -a coptic term for "my sister") I understand that catholic priests are unmarried but was curious if there are any other familial terms you use within the catholic church, especially in relation to women. You appear to be very well read and would love to hear your thoughts on this topic!
Mauricio Aguirre (8 месяцев назад)
Lizzie thanl you for defending our priests or our fathers. God bless you and keep you in his heart through our blessed mother Mary.
Amy Raab (8 месяцев назад)
Love this ! Thank you Lizzie 😃❤️️⛪️
Adam Hovey (8 месяцев назад)
Well, what should I call my father that died on 16 April 1997? You know, I find it so odd, that these folks rant against that, but they have no problem calling their Physicians doctor, which means teacher, remember we're not supposed to call anyone Rabbi either, which means teacher, so why is it only a Prohibition against calling someone father? I always found protestantism really inconsistent, some Protestants don't believe that baptism forgives sins, in spite of the fact that the Bible says exactly that, some Protestants, actually most Protestants, don't believe that Christians receive the body and blood of Christ during communion (or they believe a weird permutation of the Catholic belief) yet that was one of the clearest doctrines in the New Testament!
Male Morillo (8 месяцев назад)
I don't want to be mean, but I don't think is fair to cherry pick what should be interpreted as an hyperbole and what's literal. The reason the discrepancies you point out as evidence exist is because the Bible is not perfect and as any other religious book is full miss contradictions. I don't know if you have speak about other religions in your Chanel, but just try to see all religion through the same lens. Doing so shows that they are all more less equally contradictory and hard to swallow for our present morals (that's because the culture they come from was everything from mysogenistic to racist) ultimately making belivers have to mke all kinds of Mentalgymnastics, while also Mantaining the right amount of cognitive dissonance to not treat all religions fairly. Cognitive dissonance and Mental gymnastics are no objectively bad, we are all allowed to be inconsistent in what we believe :) So, again I'm not trying to be judgemental here
Dean Hall (8 месяцев назад)
+ Prancer. The very statement you make, is the REASON, why we had the PROTEST movement in the 1st place. Martin Luther, a Catholic Doctor of Theology, was PROTESTing the money making practice of selling Indulgences, and the very invention of PURGATORY> a Catholic "Interpretation" mentioned No-Where in their own Catholic Book. This is nonsensical. Would you buy ticket$ to heaven today if thats what your Catholic priest told you to do??????
RefusesCookies (8 месяцев назад)
That's why we need the authority of the Church to interpret what the Bible means. The Bible is a product of the Catholic Church and only the Catholic Church has the authority to interpret it. It is nonsensical to think that protestants have any authority to interpret a Catholic book.
Dean Hall (8 месяцев назад)
Ok Male Morillo. Did you look at "Dome of the Rock UFO"? It is classic flying saucer shape, hovers, emits extremely bright light and large area flash, then ascends at incredible speed. This is over most restricted airspace in the world, and very important religious place for Christians, Judaism and Islam. I think it very relevant....especially as most Christians are expecting return of christ at this very place. But you are correct. i dont know who pilots are, or what they look like. But human couldnt withstand that massive acceleration, and no human aircraft can maneuvre like that. Neil de Grasse Tyson is a NASA front man. he uses comedy to make audience think clever, but then ridicules ideas that dont go along with mainstream version. NASA is lying about the "Face on Mars". Yes, the god of the Old Testament is a "sadistic god". A jealous god. Aproves slavery, and though says "Thou shall not Kill", instructs Hebrews to wipe out Jericoh man, woman, child and animals, then burn. But Old Testament is old Egyption storys and old babylonian storys and texts. From my research, the god who claimed the whole panthenon, and said "No gods before me!", was babylonian MARDUK. In Egypt he was known as AMEN_RA. This is why prayers end in Amen. To replace this evil OT god, they wrote the New Testament and made nice Jesus to be a loving god and promise of eternal life. I dont believe in Jesus at all. Good luck and all the best Morillo.
Male Morillo (8 месяцев назад)
Dean Hall I don't know if I quite get everything you just said :( . But maybe this would help to show my position on UFO. Have you heard of Neil de Grasse Tyson and his own position on UFO. Mine is similar. If you already said is unientified you don't then get to say you know they are aliens. The conversation end there. It is not "I don't know" , therefor Aliens. As well as it is not Idk therefor God. The only thing one get to say is therefor I will keep looking for an answer. We don't have to know everything right now. It is k if you say you don't know! (If you dont believe me, I would still argue that it is better than to say you know dthise things) Christians, Muslims, Buddhist, Jainist etc. claim to know things about the universe, that nobody knows and that can mislead people (into believing they can'tengage in sexual iercourse with any other consenting adult or that they can't have an abortion or that speaking burning bushes and a benevolent, but equally mderous and sadistic God might exist. PD: ist more less the first time I post a comment and it gets answer. I'm really sorry if it insulted anybody, but at the same time I wanted to write the "sadistic God" part to try and get an answer from any theist out there. I want to know how you reconcile that part. Almost everyone I know is a theist, and offcourse as I'm not, any topic atheist related (not religion related, those are somehow ok :( )is completely out of place.
Dean Hall (8 месяцев назад)
No worries Male Morillo. No need to apoligize, I thank you for bringing up the term/label> cog diss. I was merely trying to say how we ALL are effected by it....Evolution Vs Creationism....from childhood learning and how this confusion begins. Questioning my beliefs does not scare me. I dont believe in Hell. ...........Wikipedia>>>>> The cog diss article has "Belief disconfirmation paradigm"...Liz?...>> " seeking support from others that share her beliefs, and attempting to pursuade others".....this channel is evidence of that Myself?......My cog diss is not Creatioism Vs Evolution ~ "two contradictory beliefs causing confusion" Mine is ...."or confronted by new information that conflicts with existing beliefs,ideas, or values" I believe in a 3rd alternative. The Ancient Astronaut Theory. Humanoids from space coming to Earth, and manipulating the DNA of lifeforms.(We are 98% chimpanzee, but 2 chromosomes have been spliced...and wheat also, its DNA changed to Hexploid, it cant self pollinate, it needs "man cultivation" to grow). UFOs? What a coincidence that a UFO cult was used as the 1st example of cog diss>>they still believed in UFOs even though it didnt show up when expected. My counter to that, is long before UFO cults, preachers were giving dates of the 2nd Advent, the return of christ (eg Jehovahs in 1800s) >> but still believe in Jesus when he didnt arrive........ Aliens are Demons? (according to Christians)......There is not one real example on Youtube videos. Heaps of CGI and Hollywood ones though.........*Funny it takes a Catholic priest to perform an EXORCISM* But there is multiple and global Youtube images of UFOs, the best being removed immediately>>>"This Video Does Not Exist", funny how I watched it the previous day!!!! (here too is many fake CGI and Hollywood creations. A good justification of " oh that person has just watched to much Hollywood films") Best example? "Dome of the Rock UFO".....multiple angles caught on camera and even Israeli CCTV FOX, when showing the world, showed the quickly made CGI hoax "we get them in Mississippi" > notice no reflection on top of the dome, and no moving cars in foreground.... A "miracle" over Jerusalem? The "Return of Christ coming from the sky as prophecized" ? ....I am surprised as to why this doesnt get much more exposure....seems relevent to the Holy Land to me..... Is cog diss a reason why people cant accept UFOs?....Fear of Alien invasion?( 2 series of "V", Indepedence Day, Alien 1,2,3,4,5, Battleship, War of the Worlds +++many others) As an Aussie, I would like to hear what the attitude of your country and beliefs on this are
Drew O'Neal (8 месяцев назад)
so if we are all equal... doesn't that prove the priesthood of all believers?
Thomas McEwen (8 месяцев назад)
Drew O'Neal No.
Smidlee (8 месяцев назад)
Duh! When Jesus said not to call someone father he clearly meant a spiritual father and NOT a physical father. Thus Israel referred to Abraham as father because he is the biological father. The verses you read in Matthew 26 fit the Catholic priests and Pope to the tee. Catholics are a modern day Pharisees. I can't think of any group of people that fits so well with what Jesus is describing in Matthew 26. Just look at the Pope looking down on everyone else , high and lifted up. It's very clear Jesus is not referring to biological fathers. The Bible clearly teaches all Christians are priest and all are brethren, members of one body. There are no super duper saints in scripture like you find in the Catholic church. ( of course they aren't super duper they just think they are)
Jeff Kopp (8 месяцев назад)
GOD THE FATHER is LIFE AND TRUTH not a Roman Catholic priest who lives by rituals and superstition and where does the Lord Jesus Christ say we should call Roman Catholic priests father. The Disciples don't call each other father the apostle Paul is never called father. Aaron is never called father!
Jeff Kopp (8 месяцев назад)
The Apostles were not the first Priest, Liz! According to Jewish History the Lord God called Aaron and his lineage to the Priesthood. So what Apostles came from the House of Aaron? Why are you propagating so much bad theology??
Spindle Force Engraving (8 месяцев назад)
Lizzie, look into becoming a CCD or RCIA teacher. :-) Blessings again! †
Spindle Force Engraving (8 месяцев назад)
I'm proud of you Lizzie! Blessings †
Barcelonista 1983 (8 месяцев назад)
We can only pray for heretics like Protestants and ask Christ to guide them to his church.
Bernardo lopez (8 месяцев назад)
Welcome home, I started to watch some of your first videos, and someone commented about you becoming a Catholic in the future, you mentioned you would never become Catholic, but some how I knew you were on your way to become one.  I love your videos, and thank you for doing what you're doing, you're helping to bring more young souls to God.
Edward Elkins (8 месяцев назад)
What I chose to do when I became a Catholic was just not talk to the Priests, So I didn't have to call them Father, I only go to confession when the holy spirit gives me that prompting or guides me to do that. We can confess our sins to God, God does hear without the priests being there, though there seems to be times when confessing to a priest is needed. I have spoke to only a few since 1993. I liked the music that's about it, also I really like Mass better than protestant service because I can't stand someone talking for an hour about the gospel as though they are Prophets and have so much wisdom we have to sit each Sunday just to listen to them. Catholic mass is about a 15 minute sermon or Homily. When organizing a ministry using liturgy helps to keep ministers hired from teaching false teachings on Sunday, though not completely 15 minutes can be long enough for someone to blaspheme God if that is their intent.
Jacob Klassen (8 месяцев назад)
the vatican contradicts the bible. So Catholic automatically has false teachings. There is no proof that the catholic church proceeds from Peter. Prove me wrong
Fr Pierre Farrugia ofm (8 месяцев назад)
Love the vid and explanation, but is the intentionally misleading title to the video a strategy to evangelize? :)
Duck Tails (8 месяцев назад)
I am so proud of you! It is so encouraging to watch your journey to Catholicism.
Sebastien Roux (8 месяцев назад)
“Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David!” was said by people not Jesus. Christians follow Jesus not the disciples or the people in their general vicinity. You can put your money on everything Jesus said because trusting His word is not a gamble. People however have unique ways of understanding things and saying things. Among people misunderstandings are common. So stick with the original Gospel. The words of Jesus. The way to God is through Jesus, not His disciples.
Andrew Bennett (8 месяцев назад)
Hi, I'm studying your videos to help me understand my Catholicism and get answers to counterarguments I could hypothetically make. They've been very helpful so far! Matthew 23:2 at 10:18 - I am not sure why this is establishing ex cathedra authority. This could be read as saying that the Pharisees are usurping the seat of Moses and claiming authority they do not have, rather than having legitimate spiritual authority even if they are hypocrites.
Dean Hall (8 месяцев назад)
Gday Andrew. Here is something I cant understand without questioning .....and then I researched, in depth..... MATTHEW 19:12 Jesus> "For some are born Eunechs, some made Eunechs by men, and some become *Eunechs* for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Accept this if you can." # In my bible, the last *Eunechs* has been changed to *CELIBATE*, others *renounces marriage* Why is Jesus talking about men castrating themselves to get to heaven, when he hasnt yet died for their salvation? Why change the "word of god" from Eunechs????? Was there men self castrating themselves to get to heaven in Jesus times?..... Unfortuneately, YES, there was. The GALLI priests, who came to Rome in 200BC, with their cult of Attis. Yellow frocks? Jewellry(beads)? Mitres and tiaras? A blood ritual at Easter time? Galatians? Pontus Galatia? Galillee? Transfiguration? The oracle of Delphi(church of Philidelphia)? Origen? Pederastry?. ......but then I researched and found out about the Pope Leo XIII stop hiring CASTRATO for the church. #CASTRATO ~ choir boys were castrated pre-pubescent to keep their angelic voices #PIGNA~ a giant bronze pine cone in Vatican flanked by peacocks ~ galli in latin Who today wears yellow frocks,beads,mitres and is "CELIBATE" for the kingdom of heaven? * the long history of Pedophilia and homosexuallity casts doubts on celibacy at all. I just read "CELIBACY IN CRISIS", by richard Sipe. A Catholic priest/ psyche counsellor of offenders, and admits this blatantly! The movie "SPOTLIGHT" also, and global inquirys/commissions around the world>>Cardinal Pell in Aus today! Is this why women arent allowed in the Church hierarchy?......(many suspect the Vatican is hiding something) Why does Easter change date every year?........The Pashal Full Moon? ...Hebrew Lamb sacrifice? ....But is always after the 22nd March,,,,,,,,the day the Galli priest festival began in Rome when they cut down a pine tree and sacrificed a lamb........then carried a blood stained effigy of Attis on the Pine trunk thru the streets of Rome, and in a frenzy castrated themselves on the 24th March,,,,,to be resurrected like Attis, transfigured into Cybele the great mother,,,,,,the Death of Christ? But Christ-MASS, is always Dec 25th (the old winter solstice festival~Nativitus),,,,,,,,,Xmas trees? PINE trees? Could this be true in modern times?......Curiously, I looked at old B&W photos of groups of NUNS.(many internet images can be found, I also looked at old photos in Catholic hospitals and librarys etc) Seriously Andrew, take a close look, Do they look like women to you?????????...."Accept this if you can"......
Red Pill Religion (8 месяцев назад)
Hey Lizzie. I'm a former Protestant (as well as a former atheist) and I love watching your videos so much when you talk about these things. You know one of the great things about being Catholic is that we don't actually rely on our priests to be particularly charismatic or engaging. I mean, you want that in a priest but if a priest has gotten trained and his his job right, even if you don't particularly like him at any given moment, just calling him Father reminds you who he really is. I have at least one priest I still interact with who's really annoyed me and I can tell he doesn't entirely like me. It's some sort of personal chemistry/style issue. He hasn't done anything wrong and neither have I, it's just one of those things where you just don't connect with someone for whatever reason. Yet I call him Father, and I'm so grateful for him and everything he does. Calling him Father reminds me exactly who he is: someone who's sacrificed any chance of having a wife and kids for God, someone who's given his whole life for the salvation of souls just like me. Someone with authority, who knows more than me about many important things. Even though I don't go to that particular priest for confession because he makes me uncomfortable (again, this is totally a chemistry thing, there's nothing wrong with him) I would without hesitation go to confession with him if no other priest was convenient--BECAUSE HE IS FATHER, and I utterly respect him even when I don't entirely like him. Ha, now that I think of it, I view God the same way sometimes. It sounds blashpemous but sometimes God totally p****s me off. And then I have to remind myself that's my problem not his, that's me wanting reality to be what I want rather than what he says. Calling our priests Father is wonderful.
Raphael B Babin Jr (7 месяцев назад)
Max Dean Esmay The differences in priests is evident in the popes also. The charismatic "happy" ones and the brilliant studious ones, the efficient organizational ones. Just in my lifetime there have been great contrasts. In one parish with several priests this can be the case.
Red Pill Religion (8 месяцев назад)
Paul referred to himself as the father of many Christians in 1 Corinthians. People need to learn how to read the Bible with things like context.
Mark Anthony (8 месяцев назад)
Good stuff Lizzie
Shalom Aka (8 месяцев назад)
This vedio has been definitely created & sponsored by " pervert catholics", and they are using this " dumb pussy" for it. People beware of the cunning " catholic" wolves in " sheeps clothing". No wonder catholics are the most hated people worldwide, and the real reason why the almighty had to allow "Islam to be created"( to confront this demonic menance which perverted christianity ). watch: https://youtu.be/HwyY7BvN62s .

Хотите оставить комментарий?

Присоединитесь к YouTube, или войдите, если вы уже зарегистрированы.