На главнуюОбразованиеПохожее видеоЕще от: Truth Seeker

Richard Dawkins irritated by irrationality

Оценок: 10649 | Просмотров: 852079
Категория: Образование
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Текстовые комментарии (3678)
Mansour Q. (14 часов назад)
6.18 thats the most stupid thing to say to an Atheist, fuck lol hahaha
Peter T (1 день назад)
Open your head and feed it with facts
Seiminthang Sungte (1 день назад)
Richard will be leading scientist in hell😅
Sliegrom B (1 день назад)
If our morality is RATIONAL why do we keep using technology and advocating for science when it has been proven that the use of such things is literally destroying the Earth and will in all probability result in our own extinction as a species. We are in the last decades where we can truly prevent this outcome. And we are told to have FAITH in science, that they it will be our savior at the zero hour and miraculously invent and implement technology far beyond anything we currently have in order to secure our survival. Or we believe children's fairy tales of inner solar system colonization without being able to reliably engineer to a level of quality vehicles and living environments capable of sustained independent living in extreme environments. Nor have we managed to remove the need for Earth gravity in our own biological processes. Or the fact that no other "easily" colonizable planet has the mass to support an atmosphere making any meaningful terraforming pointless. The best we can reasonable accomplish ever is a colony that needs a consistent and steady stream of resources from the Earth at prohibitive costs while further depleting the already scarce resources on the one habitable planet we have. Belief in such myths is no different than believing in the second coming of Christ or that God will save you and transport you to some promised Land. Science has just become the new god for the same tired Christian worldview. At this point the fact that we just don't just abandon all science and technology because it is inherently destructive and we have run out of time demonstrates that as a species do not act rationally, that our morality is not based upon logical discourse to preserve the best possible scenario for man, but instead is just a bunch of laws put in place to benefit a certain sect of the population. Logic and reason has nothing to do with.
Sliegrom B (1 день назад)
I love how Dawkins only attacks Abrahamic religions.....and then says religion isn't valid....yeah ok in order to truly say that all religions are invalid he would have to first address them first. Honestly though his arguments fall way short of doing that for many religions and his claims that ALL religions are invalid is actually a logical fallacy....he is an irrational douche
heighwaysonthewing (1 день назад)
I am not sure but I think the 10 thousand year claim is how long man kind has been on the earth, not the age of the earth, that's what I get out of it anyway, either way Dawkins is smug arrogant and wrong and a total bum hole . if you are going to have an idea that you believe , don't have it because this dickhead told you so.
longears34 (1 день назад)
No, it is actually a claim as to the age of the universe.
Zuhaib M (1 день назад)
The Quran doesn’t say anything about 10 thousand years.
Oliver Eales (2 дня назад)
Australian politicians come across as proper hypocritical cunts... even by British standards, 'the British Imperial Cunt of Cunt'
doh1959 (3 дня назад)
heres the point why has creation got to be just the bibles god. i believe in creation but by a superior intelligence.loads of reasons why this is so
Aidan Jacobs (4 дня назад)
That Santa Claus comment was spot on xD
Floxxoror (5 дней назад)
Primitives Dreckspack!
Dark Spell (5 дней назад)
Richard Dawkins is such a logical and amazing human being.
Critchan (5 дней назад)
WTH is happening with Dawkins at 3:37
studio7 (6 дней назад)
It would be great if Australia would be the first atheist Country in the world..id move there.
Gazza Clarkson (6 дней назад)
[In whining nasal voice] .... "the trouble is, people don't respect eachother..." welcome to the real world, bitch. Respect is earned. If I think you're a religious retard, I'll fucking tell you, so don't insist I "respect" you instead.
Huw chardon (6 дней назад)
Creationism far more sensible than evolution, which is bollocks.
bobbydylanio (3 дня назад)
Wow. I mean, I did believe in evolution but your argument was so strong I can hardly find fault with it.
youeatshowieategg (7 дней назад)
Why did Julie Bishop mention the Psalms in relation to the New Testament? The way she structured her statement makes me think she believes they are in the New Testament. Not too great for a Christian.
Gelila Getahun (7 дней назад)
"That's a non-trivial error" lmaooooo
Henk Lubbe (7 дней назад)
I believe moralities comes from God. I challenge everyone and anyone to prove that moralities comes from another source.
jim jamjam123 (8 дней назад)
someone that is switched on, what a clever man.
GrK38 (8 дней назад)
Tony Burke is your typical MORON Aussie that you just want to punch in the mouth when he speaks hahaha
Jack Maclean (8 дней назад)
Man those christians on the panel are snowflakes. Why cant people have a conversation without being so sensitive and victimised. Dawkins states what is shown in biblical texts and everyone on the panel is offended by what their own religion proclaims. The thinking of these people is backwards
Live Stream (8 дней назад)
Richard Dawkins is a fraud
energybengt (9 дней назад)
at 5:00 ... Tony Burke makes an eloquent and human observation here. I think he summarizes the "argument" here perfectly. We all need to move beyond our own belief structure as much as we are able, to embrace the entire expression of humanity, if we are to work together for our mutual benefit. I'm not saying any of this is easy .... and maybe it's not possible for us to co-operate. I also love what Dawkins says about not wanting an absolute morality. Listening to all "sides" brings us closer .... instead of people hating each other and calling others "morons" etc. It's not about one person being right or wrong. I hope we move in that direction.
Henry Noone (9 дней назад)
I dont blame the english people for sending their convicts to australia . Obviously they were the ancestors of idiots like this gentleman
Dobberman Szeven (9 дней назад)
Dissing on the fundamental absurdity of biblical scripture, is also dissing on the billions of lives who've ever lived and who took these at heart. Nowadays an argument won on reason is only obvious. However, reason was (and is not) natural to men. It had (and has) to be acquired through freedom of thought and teachers. People back in the day could not rely on reason because they had neither. To be honest, they even had a tiny life expectancy too. So, they relied instead on moral teachings (yes, often expressed in absurd ways). Moral teaching ARE natural to men, they get it. Are men today more reasonable? Only in so far their broad education allows for this. We still need people like Dawkings to enlighten us (teachers). It doesn't mean that men are stupid. They simply ignorant of certain lessons. Reason is not natural to men.
Arpit Mehta (9 дней назад)
I'm actually super grateful to Prof richard Dawkins because unlike a lot of atheists (including myself) he's able to put the points across so well even religious people can't deny them, the one's that do are simply idiots who have made no effort to understand what he's saying.
EdgyShooter (9 дней назад)
Well if wars were fought in the name of Santa Claus then yes I definitely think we should make sure children didn't believe in him
Cockoff Gewgle (9 дней назад)
I didn't realise Aussies were such morons.
Dimitri Jones (10 дней назад)
Science in Adam and Eve: In the story of Adam and Eve, God created Adam from the surface of the ground, every element that exists in the ground is also found in humans. Out of the 206 bones in the human body, a rib is only one that can grow back again if surgically removed correctly. Doctors and scientists do not know why rib is the only bone that can grow back. What's inside of a rib. Bone marrow can be infused back into your body and it can help regrow damaged organs, there are 5 common donor spots: the cranium or the skull, the sternum, vertebrae in the back, the pelvis and you guessed it the rib. What bone marrow transplantation can actually do: now if you look up bone marrow transplantation and stem cell transplantation you will find there's not a whole lot of difference the only difference is you're getting stem cells, now whether you get them from the bones or from blood, that's the two differences, but stem cells can actually regrow organs. They've actually shown that you can actually regrow tiny livers, they call liver buds, there are people who are working on being able to eventually regrow a brain. Now story says that God created Eve only by one bone that contains stem cells that in reality can regrow organs. This is not so strange considering that it is possible to create a human clone with a small sample. .
Dimitri Jones (7 дней назад)
Every element you can find in man can be found on the surface of the ground, not in tree but in ground. I'm not sure why He used the rib to make a woman, I gess we never know but good question. If you really do not believe in God you woud not ask why God permits suffering. Nobody normal will ask if Santa Claus exists why did not he bring me gifts last christmas. Studies have shown that atheists have anger towards God which should not exist if they truly do not believe in God.
ourorboros2 (8 дней назад)
" every element that exists in the ground is also found in humans." as they are found in everything that exists on the planet... what else could anything be made from...? what were expecting people to made from? unicorn horn? as for the rib, not disputing that humans can regrow ribs and im gonna gloss over most what you've said to simply ask, if god is able to create matter, as he created the universe, and is able to create humans... why bother taking the rib from one human to make another? just make another human... like... this is what gets me... your god behaves in really irrational ways and none of you seem to have a problem with this, your god created humans, one he just made out of the earth but the other apparently required a rib bone for some reason... he imbued these creatures with free will and curiosity and then gave them an arbitrary rule about not eating from a specific tree, which being omniscient he already knew humans were going to eat from, and then got angry... and in order to forgive humans for this he apparently had to send his son down to earth to be murdered... how that one works im not even gonna begin to try to understand. i mean seriously... you have stories about how your god literally just murders every first born in egypt in order to convince them slavery was wrong... like... this doesn't sound like something you should be worshipping...
MV Mv (10 дней назад)
What i mean is that evolution is allso a religion but they don't want to admit it. A normal human can't seriously think that a fish or a rock can turn into a man or woman.
MV Mv (10 дней назад)
For fuck sake, this cocksucker thinks we came from a ROCK. A ROCK. what is more stupid? To believe that a loving God puts us here or nothing exploded and then a rock turnes to a human.?
John Cowley (10 дней назад)
Christians are as bad or even worse than the Muslims.
Ameya Joshi (10 дней назад)
I want the full show. Please link anyone?!
uniseine (11 дней назад)
Gonorrhea was curable in 1950. If evolution is false, you should not be any more concerned today about gonorrhea than back then.
Science Guy (11 дней назад)
Religitards in the comments.
Jaggy (11 дней назад)
Religion is so foolish. These religious people sound like idiots. Very embarrassing to watch when the audience seem more enlightened than the majority of the panel.
OTISIN GREENER (12 дней назад)
JESUS PEOPLE GET ASS FUCKED!!!!!!
Michael Kelloway (12 дней назад)
As an Australian I am very, very ashamed of these people. No conviction, no courage, no brains. It's a wonder that the country isn't just one big mess - oh wait.......
laeeque nadvi (13 дней назад)
(4) Evolution Or Qur'nic Account of Creation A Comparision of the Argument Fallacies of Theory of Evolution Even in Darwin's time, fossils were already posing a big obstacle to the theory. Darwin himself accepted the lack of the fossils of " intermediate species. However, despite all paleotologists' efforts, the fossil records continued to remain a serious obstacle to the theory. Though all that has been written by scientists and researchers against this theory is voluminous, a few samples will suffice; The Encyclopaedia of Ignorance published by by the Oxord carries articles from 60 noted scientific scholars. One of these articles has been titled as " Fallacies of Evolution Theory". It concludes that the man's knowledge about evolution is nil and to regard this knowledge as ' factual is a fallacy. It's author Tomin writes in his article at the end: " The present impasse in evolutionary thinking productive of so many fallacies, Is due chiefly to the interpretation of biological fact in terms of out-of- date physical theory.(3) Another biologist, Chardin writes in his book entitled The Phenomenon of Man: " No amount of historical research will ever reveal the details of this story. Unless the science of tomorrow is able to reconstruct the process in the laboratory, we shall probably never find any material vestige of this emergence of the microscopic from the molecular, of the organic from the chemical, of the living from the pre-living.. " (4) Lecomte Du Nouy, the noted French researcher and author of the marvellous treatise Human Destiny dismissed the theory of chance and Genesis by itself ( Spontaneous generation) through a massive mathematical analysis and says that the biological origin can not be solved without accepting a miracle. He goes on to prove that even the exciting age of the earth is not sufficient to produce a molecule by accidental accumulation of various elements in a particular proportion. He wrote: " However, if this happened and we maintained our confidence in the calculus of probabilities it would be equivalent to admitting a miracle, and the result would be : ONE SINGLE MOLECULE, or at most two or three. Life itself is not even in question but merely of the substance which constitute living beings. Now one molecule is of no use. Hundreds of millions of identicl ones are necessary. (5) He further writes : " In the second place, it has been shown that, on the basis of our present knowledge namely, by using the same method which have been proved so useful for the interpretation of our inanimate world, it was impossible to explain, or to account for, not only the birth of life but even the appearance of the substances which seemed to be required to build life, namely, highly dissymmetrical molecules. (6) Another among the noted researchers Dr. Isaac Asimov while discussing the mysterious constitution of DNA, stresses that there are strong relationship between the origin of life and religious faith: He writes: " Without DNA, living organism could not reproduce,and life as we know it could not have started. All the substances of living matter - enzymes and all the others, whose production is catalised by enzymes - depend in the last analysis on DNA. How, then, did DNA, and life start ? (3) Duncan, Ronald & Westen-Smith, Miranda, eds., The Encyclopaedia of Ignorance , Pergamon Press, 1978, p.234. (4) Yusuf, Mohammad Ali, Masraud Darwiniah, Darus Shrooq, Jeddah, 1403A.H.,P.36. (5) Ibid., p.270. (6) Asimov's Guide to Science, Vol. 2, The Biological Scìences, Pelican Books, Middlesex, 1978,P. 172-73 (7) Ibid., p. 174.
Rusty Cockering (14 дней назад)
Nowhere in the Bible does it state the age of the earth.
nothosaur (15 дней назад)
Dawkins can verbally express his disrespect of religious beliefs all he wants to, and I'll never complain. I'll defend his right to verbally express it. What I am frightened of is that the European Union recently ruled that such expression can legally be punished by the government of Germany.
Cagatay Ocal (15 дней назад)
Excuses excuses, atheism is nothing but denial and insecurity
longears34 (14 дней назад)
Denial of..?
Dusk Horizon (16 дней назад)
Please read the book: Richard Dawkins: The Pope of Unreason by Mike Hockney
Urgaal Xai (16 дней назад)
4:15 kilem all alert .
dungoist (16 дней назад)
Politician. Can't piss anyone off because they want free money from taxpayers.
Lewis Taylor (16 дней назад)
I mean Christianity was essentially a terror group, you will here them say the Romans unjustly prosecuted them, when they burned down the city and desecrated pagan temples, after the fall of the empire they destroyed thousands of temples and statues and works of art and philosophy because they didn't confound to the cancer that is christianity
Jenn Smith (14 дней назад)
what you describe sounds like the atheists religious purges in the USSR & China.
Frank289100 (17 дней назад)
THE EARTH IS 4.6 BILLION YEARS OLD MY ASS. IF TOPSOIL ACCUMILATES AT 1CM EVERY 100 YEARS. THEN WHY IS IT WHEN YOU DIG THE TOPSOIL, IT GOES DOWN AROUND 2 FEET ON AVERAGE. A FOOT CONTAINS ROUGHLY 30CM AND IF THE TOPSOIL GOES DOWN 2 FEET MEANS IT IS 60 CENTIMETERS X 100 YEARS = 6000 YEAR WHICH REINFORCES THE BIBLE NOT SCIENCE. IF THE EARTH WAS 4.6 BILLION YEARS AS THE BULLSHITTERS IN SCIENCE CLAIM. THE TOPSOIL WOULD GO DOWN A 1000 FEET. OF COURSE A CREATOR GOD EXISTS. SECONDLY, EVOLUTION IS BULLSHIT AND ALWAYS WILL BE. LET'S TAKE A BIRD AS AN EXAMPLE. BIRDS HAVING THE ADVANCED DESIGN OF WINGS ENABLE THE SPECIES TO FLY HIGH UP INTO THE TREES SAFE FROM PREDITORS. IT ALSO USES THE SHELTER OF THE TREES TO REPRODUCE SO THE SPECIES SUSTAINS ITSELF. IF BIRD HAD TO WAIT MILLIONS OF YEARS AS EVOLUTION SUGGESTS TO DEVELOP THE ADVANCE DESIGNS OF WINGS. BIRD WOULD HAVE GONE EXTINCT AND BECAME A THANKSGIVING DAY TURKEY FOR THE ANTS. BIRDS HAD TO HAVE THE ADVANCED DESIGNS FROM THE BEGINING WHICH ALSO ANSWERS THE QUESTION WHICH CAME FIRST THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG. OBVIOUSLY A CREATOR WAS INVOLVED. SECONDLY WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE FOOD CHAIN IN NATURE, IT IS PREDATORY. SINCE CHARLES DARWIN STATES THAT EVERYTHING EVOLVED FROM A COMMON ORIGIN WOULD ONLY MEAN LIFE WOULD HAVE EATEN ITSELF INTO EXTINCTION FROM THE START. HOW DID THEY EVOLVE FROM EACH OTHER AND THEN FOR A SPECIES TO SURVIVE IT EATS THE ONES IT EVOLVED FROM. THIS ALONE MAKES IT IMMPOSSIBLE FOR EVOLUTION TO EVER HAVE TAKEN PLACE. LETS PUT GOD INTO A SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE. GOD IS A FORCE OF PURE ENERGY THAT EXPANDS THE INFINITE UNIVERSE, AND HE IS ALSO THE GOD OF THE BIBLE PERIOD.
longears34 (16 дней назад)
​+Frank289100 "YOU'RE SCRATCHING AND CLAWING AWAY LIKE A WILD CAT TO DISPROVE THE TRUTH THAT SHALLOW TOPSOIL PROVES THE ELEMENT OF TIME IS MISSING HERE, WHICH MEANS A YOUNG EARTH." We have already established your calculation is just wrong and using your own ridiculous method of determining the age of the earth it must be at least twenty thousand years old, which would mean the bible is wrong. I don't understand why you keep ignoring this. This is your OWN math. "IF TOPSOIL ERODED AWAY AND DISAPPEARED LIKE YOU CLAIM" I never said it disappeared. "YOU WOULD HAVE NO FRENCH FRIES, NO ONION RINGS, NO SWEET POTATOES, NO ORANGES, NO APPLES, ETC. SINCE WE HAVE THESE FRUITS, VEGETABLES, TREES, FLOWERS, GRASS, ETC AND THEY EXIST. MEANS TOPSOIL ACCUMILATES" No, I never claimed topsoil erodes and decomposes so fast that nowhere can accumulate topsoil. Topsoil accumulation speed and depth depends on geography, which is more evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about, as you've ignored this fact to cherrypick a rate that fits your predetermined conclusion. "SO WITH TIME THE TOPSOIL DEPTH WILL INCREASE AS IT HAS DONE TO REACH A DEPTH ON AVERAGE OF 2 FEET." No, topsoil doesn't only increase in depth. Let me repeat: TOPsoil is AT THE TOP. IT WILL ALWAYS BE NEAR THE TOP. IT WILL NOT BE TENS OF FEET DEEP EVERYWHERE. Huge swathes of topsoil gets wiped out with each glaciation, which means any geographic location where this would have happened cannot be older than the most recent glaciation, which was a little over 15 thousand years ago. So the depth of these places should be around two feet. Of course, had you actually not decided to cherrypick, you would have picked up a book on geology and found that topsoil can be found in modern day 16+ feet deep in a few locations. According to your own calculation... 16 FEET IS 487.68 CENTIMETERS, 487.68 CENTIMETERS X 100 YEARS = 48768 YEARS WHICH...oops, doesn't confirm the bible. In fact, according to your own logic, the bible is completely full of shit. I await your dodging of this fact.
Frank289100 (16 дней назад)
+Robert Sparling, IF TOPSOIL TODAY ON AVERAGE IS AROUND 2 FEET. THAT MEANS YEARS PRIOR IT WAS 1" THEN 2" THEN 3" THEN 10" THEN 14" THEN 18" THEN EVENTUALLY IT REACHED 24" TWO FEET. WITH TIME IT WILL CONTINUE TO INCREASE AND FROM THE PRESENT AVERAGE 2 FEET. IT WILL LATER BECOME 3 FEET THEN 4 FEET AND SO ON. THE TOPSOIL BEING SHALLOW MEANS THE ELEMENT OF TIME IS MISSING HERE WHICH PROVES ONE THING. THAT THE EARTH IS VERY YOUNG AND YET YOU WITH THAT PEANUT YOU CALL A BRAIN. CAN'T BEGIN TO GRASP THAT.
Frank289100 (16 дней назад)
+longears34 , YOU'RE SCRATCHING AND CLAWING AWAY LIKE A WILD CAT TO DISPROVE THE TRUTH THAT SHALLOW TOPSOIL PROVES THE ELEMENT OF TIME IS MISSING HERE, WHICH MEANS A YOUNG EARTH. IF TOPSOIL ERODED AWAY AND DISAPPEARED LIKE YOU CLAIM, YOU WOULD HAVE NO FRENCH FRIES, NO ONION RINGS, NO SWEET POTATOES, NO ORANGES, NO APPLES, ETC. SINCE WE HAVE THESE FRUITS, VEGETABLES, TREES, FLOWERS, GRASS, ETC AND THEY EXIST. MEANS TOPSOIL ACCUMILATES ESPECIALLY ON THE LOWER PLAINS. SO WITH TIME THE TOPSOIL DEPTH WILL INCREASE AS IT HAS DONE TO REACH A DEPTH ON AVERAGE OF 2 FEET. NOW TO ADDRESS THAT NOT ONLY BIRD HAD TO HAVE THE ADVANCE DESIGNS OF WINGS TO SURVIVE. BUT ALSO ALL SPECIES WHO HAVE THESE ADVANCE DESIGNS HAD TO INCORPORTE THEM FROM THE START. BECAUSE WITHOUT THEM THEY WOULD HAVE ALL GONE EXTINCT. A FELLOW I KNOW IS A MEMBER OF A CHURCH. ONE OF THE MEMBERS IN HIS CHURCH IS A RUSSIAN SCIENTISTS. FOR YEARS HE SAID HE THOUGHT HE WAS ONE OF THE MOST INTELLEGENT PEOPLE WALKING THE FACE OF THE EARTH. AS HE GOT OLDER AND GAINED WISDOM. HE STARTED TO ANALYZE WHAT HE LEARNED ABOUT THE BIG BANG THEORY AND EVOLUTION. HE REALIZED THE HUMAN BODY WAS JUST TO COMPLEX TO NOT HAVE A CREATOR AND THE UNIVERSE IS ORDERLY AND ORGANIZED WITH ITS STARS AND PLANETS. HE REALIZED THIS WAS ALL IMPOSSIBLE UNLESS A CREATOR WAS INVOLVED AND BECAME A CHRISTIAN AND TODAY AS I DO DISPROVES EVOLUTION, BUT I AM A MASTER AT DISPROVING EVOLUTION. THERE IS A CREATOR GOD PERIOD AND THE DEVIL SATAN ALSO EXISTS WHO MADE THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION UP.
Robert Sparling (17 дней назад)
+Frank the imaginary geologist.  Topsoil goes through a dynamic and continuing cycle of formation and destruction, including periods of equilibrium, not a one-way accumulation of topsoil. Is that really so difficult to figure out? The whole idea of using topsoil-formation rates to prove that the earth is young is mind-boggling!
longears34 (16 дней назад)
​+Frank289100 "TOPSOIL DOESN'T ERODED AT THE LOWER PLAIN BUT CONTINUES TO ACCUMILATE. IF THE FOREST WAS 300,000,000 YEARS OLD AS SCIENTIST GUESSTIMATE. THE TOPSOIL WOULD GO DOWN 90 FEET" The organic material, the stuff that makes topsoil topsoil, still decomposes. So it is not permanent. "IF TOPSOIL ERODED AWAY LIKE YOU CLAIM? THEN THERE WOULD BE NO FORESTS BECAUSE NO NUTRIENTS WOULD EXIST TO NURISH THEM. SO THROW THAT ONE IN THE GARBAGE. " Topsoil does not erode and decompose at such a rate that no place on earth can keep topsoil. I never said it did. I was just knocking down your ridiculous claim that topsoil is permanent, which you'd only have to look around America to see that isn't true. TOPsoil is at the TOP. Topsoil gets removed at such a rate that many places can keep about between 8 inches to two feet of it, and glaciations clear it, which means the age of the topsoil can't be older than the most recent glaciation. I've noticed you have ignored the inconvenient fact that the actual rate of topsoil accumulation already knocks down the bible's estimation of the age of the earth, being wrong by a factor of over two. Why are you lying? The ninth commandment means nothing to you? "ECONDLY, THEY ARE NOCTURNAL AND HUNT FOR FOOD AT NIGHT SAFE FROM PREDATORS. SECONDLY THEY GIVE OFF ODERS WHICH MAKE THEM UNDESIRABLE TO PREDATORS AND THE REASON THEY ARE NOT HUNTED FOR FOOD. ONCE AGAIN THROW THAT ONE IN THE GARBAGE. IF IT WASN'T FOR THE ADVANCE DESIGNS IN ANY OF THE SPECIES THEY WOULD HAVE ALL PERISHED. SO THE ADVANCE DESIGNS HAD TO COME FIRST." You didn't think this through at all, so I'm not even going to waste my time responding to it.
Jesus Gallegos (17 дней назад)
Is it me or does this sound more like a Monty Python skit
felipe martinez (17 дней назад)
Please, send this video to those stupid politics. Post it in their Facebook or something. I bet they haven't changed a bit since then in their beliefs; but will be great that they see this again and feel how really idiotic they looked just a while ago
Mischa G. Munnecke (17 дней назад)
I hate when people can’t answer a simple fucking question.
Quixy Lados (18 дней назад)
Is Australia as dumb as it looks?
Anthony Townsend (18 дней назад)
Australian TV audiences seem to have IQ about 100 pts above UK, or perhaps the UK producers are just better at vetting for "Lefty dunces only", as on BBC Question Time.
gumpfoo65 (18 дней назад)
Religious people will be slaughtering each other until the world is a cinder.
conlan gooch (19 дней назад)
So when asked a question.... he didnt answer HAHAHHA
Hubris (20 дней назад)
Some of the "Christians" are too afraid to be straight-forward with their beliefs. Why? Because they don't know their beliefs. So it's a lack of understanding of the Bible and a fear of being ostracized and embarrassed that makes them give garbage defenses for their beliefs. Whether the belief is compelling or not, trying to please the crowd, who wants a complete answer will not gain you respect.
R Nickerson (21 день назад)
Is that Australian guy refusing to answer because he doesn't actually believe in Creationism as he says and only "believes" it because he relies on religious votes, or because he doesn't want to be pinned to a specific point of view, or because he has absolutely no idea what he's talking about?
Robert Sparling (17 дней назад)
Generally it is because politicians don't like to declare any position that could alienate them from voters.
R Nickerson (21 день назад)
Truth is not determined by each individual... facts are not something to be debated... you don't get to draw your own conclusion about the literal facts surrounding you...
LionTrader (21 день назад)
Most of human kind are arrogant, delusional, and lack the ability to think logically which is why religion is so popular. For example, if you ask a christian person where the bible came from they will most likely tell you it's the word of God. FALSE: The bible was created at the counsel of Nicea where the Roman Emperor Constantine (pagan worshiper) paid the catholic church to come to an agreement and made political decisions when forming the bible. It was then deemed the word of god but in reality Emperor Constantine was faced with a collapsing empire and what better way to unit a group of people than religion and telling them to believe or you will burn in a pit of fire for eternity? The bible is the word of a pagan Emperor and a corrupt Catholic church, because they were paid by Constantine, not the word of God. Interestingly enough the old testament wasn't even written down for 2,000 years. The old testament was spread via word of mouth and stories. I'm sure you've heard of the telephone affect where you tell your friend something then they tell the person next to them and by the time it goes through 20 people it's completely changed. Now imagine doing that for 2,000 years before writing it down. The funny part is that 99% of Christians don't know this but blindly follow the bible with out question or doing research about it's origins. What's even more insane is that some follow it with a literal interpretation. Most Christians that read with will start to feel angry and attacked instead of looking into the information I just provided.
colin hart (21 день назад)
I feel almost bad for the religious trying to argue with logic. It makes you feel as if people who are religious are locked into a really non logical way of thinking, which is sad if you want to believe the truth.
ManDevil (21 день назад)
Well, this is uncomfortable... I'm Australian but haven't lived there for almost 30 years. And yet this video still makes me cringe.
Olinek17 (21 день назад)
I've noticed that often in eyes of an atheists you can see a sparkle, and in eyes of religious people you can see a fog. They also look worse, have boring clothes and hairstyles.
Michael M (21 день назад)
The claim starting at 7:20 Bullshit. Take a look around! Not EVERYONE believed in slavery centuries ago. Same shit happens now that happened 2000 years ago. Even worse shit.
SNORKYMEDIA (18 дней назад)
Not EVERYONE believed in slavery centuries ago and your proof of this is ....
Tylr Kozelisky (21 день назад)
Guess we’d better not vote for trump then I guess. Don’t want him FIGHTING for them coal miners lol
LeJune Berry (21 день назад)
Notice the way the Christians demand respect. They can't earn it based on their logic or good sense, their command of history or ethics. They just demand it.
Garidex (22 дня назад)
I also wish this video didn’t include the Audience of babbling condescending atheists false laughing as loud as they can over genuine discourse
Gazza Clarkson (6 дней назад)
But you're supposed to respect them, retard. So don't make fun of them. QED.
SNORKYMEDIA (18 дней назад)
how do you know thay are athiest laughs?
Garidex (22 дня назад)
I am very sad that the ad for this video was that bullshit Gaia alien streaming app
William Spiers (22 дня назад)
Creationism should not be confused with creation. The former takes a literal view of the Genesis account of six .creative days The Bible sometimes uses a day for a year hence a total of 6000 years. However, Genesis does not purport to use this formular
Johannes Wiberg (23 дня назад)
The video cuts out any response. But I've seen the argument he lays out at the end of the video and I've never heard anything remotely close to a good reply. The "absolute morality of scripture" argument falls so flat when you think about it for even a second, I can't believe it's still used even by the most uninformed.
MrReierz (23 дня назад)
How to win an argument: make everyone laugh at the one person who thinks differently
SNORKYMEDIA (18 дней назад)
How to win an argument: demonstrate that persons position is ridiculous
Abdul Nabi (23 дня назад)
Frankly these folks should be ridiculed... they’re spouting off fairy tales and thinking we can’t have morality without them? Maybe they can’t, but decent people can... that’s what makes religious folks so dangerous... they’re admitting they’re amoral and likely violent people without the sky man threatening them with fairy tale books
Mikael Lewis (23 дня назад)
Dawkins body language at 3:38...lol. “Oh my gawd...not this again”!
David Scott (23 дня назад)
If you spout religious drivel, it is the duty of sane men to say you are talking bollocks,
John Urwin (24 дня назад)
I SEE THE WORLD AS A MENTAL HOSPITAL WHERE THE PATIENTS ARE ASKING EACH OTHER FOR HELP WHATS THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE .JOHN URWIN God and the devil are one and the same
andrew warren (24 дня назад)
Kinda felt sorry for him.
Aune (24 дня назад)
i mean, if we are creation, as i know NOTHING OF and have no right to speak, but when i hear the word, i automatically think about fast food, its simply is THERE, it "came to be" after minutts of waiting, and the process as its happening, we have no idea whats going on up to the moment we got it, ready to be eaten.. so what i'm getting at is that creation, simply mean in dumb terms.. - it was nothing, then it was, plants,animals,humans, giant skeleton structures we have found across the ages, but no idea whats it looked like with flesh and skin and its fur, but we call it dinosaurs and imagine it as damn lizards type of thing out of convenience.. it simply are.. nothing leading up to it, we are just stuck at the conclusion? .. as mention'd i have no idea, creation can be about how a God snapped his fingers and things came to be, but neglects who that fucker parents are, , who snapped them into being? are all things create'd by a series of finger snapper entities in the end?
samay jain (24 дня назад)
Religious people these days are very illogical. Especially the *Monotheistic Religious people.*
Brad Grady (24 дня назад)
"What kind of a horrible and depraved notion is that?" Yeah, really.
John Stofko (24 дня назад)
The best argument against existence of God are small children dying from cancer.
ratoig (25 дней назад)
Me irritated by Richard Dawkins' irrationality!
Rafael Robyns (25 дней назад)
4:14 That look is clearly edited in. If you are interested in truth don't manipulate it.
Smirky Hawk (25 дней назад)
Being gay isn’t a choice and it isn’t a bad thing. Change my mind.
Jeffrey Conner (25 дней назад)
If God loved us so much. Then stop being the angry kid that burns ants(us) with a magnifying glass. After all the whole point of our being is(in the bible)the war is between The Morning Star and God. In the bible we are just collateral damage and nothing more. Hell there is even a better(but also flawed god) in the T.V. show Supernatural. I would at least hang out with Chuck! He said he was wrong and made a mistake. And really the god is Jesus thing again. That makes no seance. He ordered Abraham to kill Isaac his real son. So would it not make sense if it were true.That god would have a child. An not with out president as there are accounts of Angles having offspring called Nephilim. So it would only make sense if he gave up his child and not himself. Was there a person named Jesus? Most likely. Son of God? Maybe.. But the big picture if it's all true is that we are still the ants under the magnifying glass. And in the end we are unimportant in the grand plan...The END>>>>>>>>>
KbcBerlin (25 дней назад)
If something cannot stand some ridicule, then it is not worth much... There is no such thing as " absolute morality " We are limited, and can create nothing absolute, That is probably why people invented a God so they could profess their morality as absolute.,
Ansgar (26 дней назад)
Quote by Neil deGrasse Tyson: "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." I just love this sentence.
Walteria Music (26 дней назад)
Dear Richard, How does One skate around the Molecular Level of evolution ? How does One believe that there is Evidence of any Transitional Species Change here on Earth, when there is ABSOLUTELY None ? How does One believe that a living organism has been found inside of a meteorite here on Earth when there are Absolutely None.... We suspect...... faith !! a very weird intangible for You to promote........ If You ever truly discover evidence, You will become an instant Multimillionaire or even a Billionaire !! But until then, You will have to resign to etching out a nice living giving out assumptions of bones & Illustrations...We suppose it's a Bit like St Nick ?
Walteria Music (23 дня назад)
+longears34 We don't know why We just Love it But We do....... Grovel.........
Walteria Music (23 дня назад)
+longears34 Pyschosis : a warped view of Reality............
longears34 (23 дня назад)
You're welcome to give me a passage from any book on biology that suggests dogs should evolve into horses. You won't, of course, because you can't, because none exist.
Walteria Music (23 дня назад)
+longears34 Somebody been Foolin' You, Hey Christmas is Comin' soon.... You probably believe in Santa Claus too, Enjoy ur Pyschosis.....
longears34 (23 дня назад)
You have no idea what you're talking about.
dead.deanders (26 дней назад)
all these women that believe in the bible or quran sure as hell like that 21st century freedom.
Alex Ahonen (27 дней назад)
Why is it all the actually clever people are seen as crazy and the actual crazy masses are seen as normal. Its not just the politicians who suck where to they come from?maybe something else sucks maybe the public sucks fuck hope.
Servodude1 (27 дней назад)
Ohhh the treachery ofAunty Julie is awesome lol
laeeque nadvi (28 дней назад)
Evolution vs Qur'anic Account of Creation. A Comparision of the Argument BY: DR.MOHAMMAD LAEEQUE NADWI " Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation and that is unthinkable. " Sir. Arther keith: Islamic Thought, Dec. 1961 The present impasse in evolutionary thinking,productive of so many fallacies is due chiefly to the interpretation of biological fact in terms of outofdate physical theory. " Tomlin: Encyclopaedia of Ignorance, Oxford, 1978, p.234
Rich Cook (28 дней назад)
I don't have any views, I'm a politician.
nick fethers (29 дней назад)
who voted this moron in, and tony Burke dont try to lecture a man whos intelligence is far greater to yours
Hazel The McWitch (29 дней назад)
He’s incredibly blunt whilst staying so refined it’s a wonderful combination I ❤️ Professor Dawkins what an intellect 🤔
Greg Egan (30 дней назад)
I can totally understand how Richard Dawkins just gave up trying to educate idiots, at some point you just have to say enough wasting of my time.
How NOT To Be An Asshole (30 дней назад)
Is this a fair representation of Australia? Yikes!
Mik3yTheRock (30 дней назад)
The problem is, they invitie people which dont uderstand bible, I would really apperciate the dialogue between R Dawkins and some good theologians, that actually know how to interpret Bible
AMYSLOAN TV (30 дней назад)
'Richard Dawkins irritated by irrationality'...How does he live with himself then, he's one of the most irrational people on the planet.
Dangerous Don (30 дней назад)
typical politician, can't or won't answer a yes or no question.
joel turner (30 дней назад)
Faith and belief in people and each other is far more powerful than faith in any GOD .
Tristan Möller (1 месяц назад)
Haha this used to be crazy, now it's normal in america lmao

Хотите оставить комментарий?

Присоединитесь к YouTube, или войдите, если вы уже зарегистрированы.